Two professionals in a one-to-one advisory conversation

Coaches & mentors

Start development conversations with clearer evidence

Bring structured assessment into coaching, mentoring and development work to identify relevant themes, focus the conversation and make progress more concrete. You lead the professional relationship and decide how the evidence is used.

Reach a useful starting point sooner

Use structured evidence to identify themes worth exploring while preserving space for the client’s context and priorities.

Make conversations more concrete

Connect reflection and professional judgement with clearly described assessment results and development themes.

Extend relevant insight into later work

Where appropriate and agreed, use the same assessment foundation across connected onboarding, coaching or development conversations.

Coaching roles

Choose the conversation you support

Use the role that best matches the professional conversations and development work you already lead.

Independent Coaches

Use structured evidence to identify worthwhile themes for coaching conversations while keeping the client’s context and priorities central.

Mentors

Use structured evidence to make mentoring conversations more concrete without replacing professional judgement or lived experience.

Coaching and Leadership-development Providers

Integrate structured assessment into leadership and broader development work where it helps frame useful reflection and follow-up.

Career and Transition Coaches

Use relevant assessment evidence to support career, transition, and early-role conversations where the agreed purpose makes that appropriate.

How the engagement works

The practitioner leads the conversation. HRP provides the structured evidence.

01

Define the purpose and role context

Clarify the development, mentoring, onboarding, mobility, or transition purpose and the relevant professional context.

02

Select the appropriate assessment and report

Choose the assessment and report that fit the use case, participant, practitioner role, and required authorization.

03

The participant completes the assessment

The participant completes the relevant assessment within the agreed delivery and data-handling process.

04

Review the structured evidence with agreed support

The practitioner reviews the report with the HRP support agreed for that service, report type, training, and authorization level.

05

The practitioner leads the conversation

The practitioner decides what becomes relevant for the conversation and any further work, using the evidence as one structured input rather than a prescribed conclusion.

The appropriate report, practitioner role and required HRP support depend on the use case, training and authorization.

Practitioner support

Practical inputs for focused development conversations

01

relevant strengths and development themes

02

motivational patterns and work preferences

03

behavioural tendencies relevant to the agreed purpose

04

possible tensions, risks, or areas to explore

05

themes for reflection and follow-up

These inputs are starting points for professional exploration. Their relevance is established in conversation with the participant and within the agreed purpose.

Session value

Use the report to improve the conversation, not replace it

A clearer starting point

Structured evidence gives the practitioner and participant a more grounded place to begin the conversation.

More focused questions

The report helps the practitioner ask better-targeted questions without replacing discovery, observation, or judgement.

Greater continuity between sessions

Relevant themes can carry into later sessions where the agreed purpose and professional context support that use.

Documented themes for reflection

The practitioner and participant can use documented themes to support reflection and agreed next steps over time.

Development evidence

Evidence-informed development conversations

Research supports coaching, mentoring and well-designed leadership development as meaningful contributors to learning, goal attainment, workplace skills and career development. HRP does not replace these professional processes. It provides structured evidence that can strengthen needs analysis, focus reflection and support more relevant follow-up.

Selected meta-analytic research

Ways to use HRP

Add structured assessment to the way you already work

These are possible formats, not fixed packages every practitioner must offer.

Assessment plus professional session

Use an appropriate assessment and report as preparation for one focused professional conversation.

Leadership-development package

Integrate structured assessment into a broader leadership-development engagement led by the practitioner.

Onboarding or transition support

Use relevant assessment evidence to support reflection during a new role, career transition or early onboarding period.

Recurring development service

Use assessment at an appropriate point within a longer coaching, mentoring or development relationship.

Practitioner pathway

Start with support and develop capability over time

You can begin with one suitable client case and agreed HRP professional support. As your experience develops, the delivery model can be adapted following the training and authorization required for the relevant service and report type.

Supported first use

Agree the purpose, assessment, report and professional roles for one appropriate client engagement.

Guided practitioner use

Use the report within your work with the interpretation or review support agreed for that service.

Trained and authorized use

Where the required qualifications, training and authorization are in place, the practitioner can lead the agreed use of relevant HRP reports with defined HRP support.

Supported first case

Make the first client case concrete before expanding

A coach or mentor can begin with one supported client case. The practitioner leads the relationship, while HRP provides the agreed assessment evidence and support needed to make the first engagement usable in practice.

01

The client completes the appropriate HRP assessment

Choose the assessment and report that fit the agreed coaching, mentoring, onboarding, or development context.

02

HRP provides the report and agreed professional review/support

HRP provides the structured evidence, the relevant report, and the agreed review or support for that use case.

03

The coach or mentor structures the goals and sessions

The practitioner uses the evidence to focus goals, questions, reflection, and the next sessions without giving up professional judgement.

04

Professional-use and interpretation boundaries stay clear

The practitioner works within the agreed purpose, authorization, report boundaries, and participant consent process.

Partner example

Marijeta Kobetić, PhD

HRP Advisory & Implementation Partner

HRP works with experienced professionals who can help make supported use cases practical. Marijeta Kobetić is one example from that network, with relevant experience in mentoring and coaching support, onboarding, employee development, and helping organizations introduce and apply HRP evidence-based psychometric decision support.

  • mentoring and coaching support
  • onboarding
  • employee development
  • introducing and applying HRP evidence-based psychometric decision support

Commercial basis

Clear pricing for the HRP part of your service

HRP's published prices for organizations provide the reference point for assessment and included HRP support. Practitioner-specific terms reflect the agreed delivery model and professional support. The practitioner determines the price of any broader coaching, mentoring or development service.

Responsible use

Clear boundaries protect the practitioner and participant

  • Assessment supports professional judgement.
  • The report does not diagnose the participant.
  • The report does not prescribe the conversation or development plan.
  • Purpose, access, consent and professional roles must be agreed.
  • Training and authorization requirements depend on the report and service.
  • The practitioner remains responsible for the professional conversation.
Review method and responsible use

Explore the fit

Explore how structured assessment could fit your practice

Start with one type of client, conversation or development engagement. We can examine the appropriate assessment approach, professional roles and whether a supported first case would make sense.

Make development conversations more concrete

Use structured assessment as evidence for the work you already lead.